Is
Tesla Overreaching With Giga factory tactics?
I do agree with the technical innovation that Tesla wants to proceed with i.e by powering their vehicles with a lithium ion battery a would make the car travel upto 200 miles on a charge.Their request for a statewise bidding and hence invest all the state funding($500 million) on a company is something very impractical with which I don’t agree.A business always has two sides, the company and it’s customers i.e people, and the relationship it establishes is always symbiotic i.e both the sides depend and benefit from each other.But they are always two seperate entities.Assuming that a state agrees to fund tesla $500 million,how will the locals of the state benefit from it?Logically if Tesla is getting the desired funding,to balance the other side of the equation,the people of the state should also get the Model 3 for a highly subsidized price(say, 1/10th of the price) or a similar kind of settlement.Only then will their proposal seem sound.Their current proposal is breaking the foundation on which a business is established i.e customer focus.
If I am to judge from the point of view of the
government,all the states should sit together and analyze Tesla’s profits and
do indepth research of their products(from the technical viewpoint) to get a
clearer picture of the company’s main goals,their intention behind requesting
for a bidding proposal.Secondly,the state governments should fund the project
that has a top priority or that which needs improvement in the state and most
importantly which involves people as a whole and changing their lives to make
it better.
Yeah you are right, investing too much in only 1 sector would make other sectors go down and hence its very important to have broader thought and give equal importance to education, infrastructure etc, this would result in over all development of the state,
ReplyDelete